St. Helens councilors accuse local resident of 'trying to take over government'

Councilors Doug Morten and Phillip Barlow have sued citizen Sally Gump for defamation

By Kelly Moyer

The South County Spotlight, Oct 22, 2008, Updated Oct 30, 2009 (16 Reader comments)

Kelly Moyer / The South County Spotlight

St. Helens resident Sally Gump, pictured here in her kitchen baking cookies for her son, a freshman at Western Oregon University, says she can't believe two city councilors have sued her for defamation of character. The two sides will meet in Columbia County Circuit Court next Monday.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Sally Gump had read the most recent court filings in her lawsuit against two St. Helens city councilors. She’d even highlighted passages and made notes in the margins of the rebuttal her lawyer sent over.

But somehow Gump missed the most attention-grabbing sentence.

“I didn’t notice it until my friend called and said, ‘Did you see this? They say you’re trying to overthrow the government!’ I was shocked,” Gump says.

It was the very last sentence in the three-page report councilors Doug Morten and Philip Barlow filed in the ongoing legal battle that started with Gump’s efforts to recall the two councilors and progressed into a defamation suit against Gump, a lifelong Columbia County resident.

The two sides will meet in Columbia County Circuit Court at 3:45 p.m. Monday, Oct. 27. The two councilors filed suit against Gump this summer, saying she had made slanderous remarks against them and had printed libelous material in a flyer for the recall effort.

In the most recent rebuttal, filed earlier this week by the two councilors’ attorney, James Huffman, of the St. Helens law firm Huffman and O’Hanlon, Morten and Barlow accuse Gump, a homemaker and mother of a college freshman, of “participating as part of an organized effort to take over the government in St. Helens” to prove malicious intent.

“Once I read that sentence I thought, ‘Oh my God. Are they serious? Are you kidding me?’” Gump says. “But now I just want my day in court. I want to hear what their case is against me.”

The court records show that Morten and Barlow are accusing Gump of purposely trying to ruin their good character in public by printing and stating false accusations against them.

“Her statements are willfully false or, at best, they are published in reckless disregard of the truth,” states Morten in court documents. “All of this circumstantial evidence … shows (Gump) has actual malice to make false statements.”

But proving a defamation case against Gump may be a lot harder than the two councilors reckoned.

1 | 2 Next Page >>